and the piss poorest, most irresponsible and non-researched reporting I have seen in a decade and I have seen a lot. His
latest piece in the Medical Daily's "Healthy Living" section is headed:
In his write up, Mr Mientka essentially recycles a Daily Mail article -
this one:
which reports on a
paper from Dr Vijendra Singh which finds inappropriate antibodies in autistic children vaccinated with MMR. If that sounds both familiar and old, it is not surprising. That article is 11 years old! Granted, as previously blogged by
Liz Ditz and
jdc325, the Daily Fail does not often provide date stamps on their
articles, but the page info clearly has 2002-08-09 as a publication
date. JDC did write to the Daily Mail in 2011, but it seems they did not add a date. However, the fact that the "current" measles cases in the Daily Mail article are compared to "the
last quarter of 2001" should have given Mr Mientka a hint. Or if he misread that, seeing
Andrew Wakefield being referred to as "a British expert", who "found fragments of the measles virus from the MMR jab in the guts of autistic children"..."earlier this year" should have made him suspicious. Or that the article is "no longer" accepting comments? At the very least, a quick check
with the National Autistic Society in the UK would have
shown them NOT
to call for suspending the MMR and
Jonathan Harris has not worked for
NAS since 2008 anyway is the Birmingham contact for
Jabs. It is one thing for an anti-vaccine cureby or granola-mummy page to fall for such an obviously outdated article, but a journalist, one would think, should be a bit more careful. At the time of me writing this, the article had been tweeted 18 times.
Todd W. was fast to ask Mr Mientka for his sources - the answer was a bit vague:
This one, a few minutes later, is a bit more promising:
Yes, please! In all likelihood, everyone will still be playing "whack a geriatric mole" for weeks, thanks to one person's shoddy research.
Edited to correct that Mr Harris is actually
working for Jabs, a UK anti-vaccine organisation. This is a mistake that Mr Mientka took from the Daily Mail web site, but the BBC
had it right in 2002.