Pages

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Still no independent confirmation of Wakefield's claims

One of the things that anti-vaccines groups desperately want to have, is the scientific support for their claims. A lot of parents know that rigorous studies, peer reviewed, published in scientific journals and indexed on Pubmed are the standard in discussions about medical care. Therefore, the anti-vaccine brigade are trying to maintain that, really, countless scientific studies across the globe have shown that vaccines are bad for you.

The anti-vaccine, pro-any-conspiracy theory website Whale.to (the citation of which automatically invokes Skopie's Law), provides a neat shopping list that staunch supporters of the long debunked “MMR causes inflammation of the gut which somehow causes autism and Andrew Wakefield is really a hero” notion can use to spam evidence based discussions, as recently seen on the Shot of Prevention blog where Marsha McClelland of the “We the People United for Vaccine Education Misinformation” Yahoo group copied and pasted in support for Andrew Wakefield.

She “writes”:

In the years after his initial controversial finding, linking the MMR vaccine to Crohn’s disease and autism, he published another 19 papers on the vaccine-induced disorder.
All were peer reviewed. However, strangely enough, none of these 19 papers are ever discussed in the media. The only study that keeps seeing the light of day is the original study from 1998, along with the original questions about conflicts of interest, which he explains in great detail in this interview. (my comment - that refers to the Mercola interview with Andrew Wakefield).


Note the buzz word “peer reviewed“ – also note the fundamental misconception that anyone would give a toss whether Wakefield believes that Wakefield was correct.

She goes on:

This is very interesting indeed, because not only has he continued his own studies, but since then, a large number of replication studies have been performed around the world, by other researchers, that confirm his initial findings.
It’s been replicated in Canada, in the US., in Venezuela, in Italy [but] they never get mentioned. All you ever hear is that no one else has ever been able to replicate the findings.


That – Martha and friends – is because no one (apart from Wakefield and his buddies) has ever been able to replicate Wakefield’s claims. I had previously looked at 5 studies supposedly „independently“ replicating Wakefield, but this list was 28 citations long (I guess the length is supposed to duly impress AND to keep anyone from checking). To quote Kenneth Branagh: “There is safety in numbers”. Luckily, both Chris and Liz Ditz were bothered enough to spend their valuable time to debunk the list (THANK YOU!) – I have created a synthesis of their and my previous searches and comments to create the “one stop copy and paste resource for the evidence minded”. Links add extra depth - sorry about the length, it may exceed the number of characters allowed for blog comments...

To summarize re-using Martha’s words: you may have been tricked into believing that Andrew Wakefield’s claims had been independently verified in 28 publications from 5 different countries. I’m afraid that is false. For those of you who have swallowed this type of reporting hook line and sinker, the below debunks each of the 28 studies from around the world that have been cited in his support.

1. The Journal of Pediatrics November 1999; 135(5):559-63 =
Horvath K., Papadimitriou J.C., Rabsztyn A., Drachenberg C., Tilden J.T. 1999. Gastrointestinal abnormalities in children with autism. J. Pediatrics 135: 559-563.

This study did not look for measles virus. Instead it looks at gastrointestinal (GI) malabsoption as an underlying mechanism for autism. It does not appear to have controls with autism & without GI symptoms OR controls without autism & with similar GI symptoms. Most children with autism & GI symptoms had upper GI problems such as reflux
This in no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”, which have been shown repeatedly to have been manufactured or the result of laboratory contamination.

2. The Journal of Pediatrics 2000; 138(3): 366-372 =
Furlano RI, Anthony A, Day R, Brown A, McGarvey L, Thomson MA, Davies SE, Berelowitz M, Forbes A, Wakefield AJ, Walker-Smith JA, Murch SH. Colonic CD8 and T cell filtration with epithelial damage in children with autism. J Pediatr 2001;138:366-72.
This paper claims to have "confirm[ed] a distinct lymphocytic colitis in autistic spectrum disorders", which is something that no other research groups find and has been the center of the recent GMC hearings against Wakefield. The extreme "engineering" towards a specific gut pathology has been summarized by Brian Deer.
Note the emergence of a theme: Wakefield is a co-author and no fewer than 7 of this paper's authors are also authors on the retracted paper in The Lancet; this paper cannot be said to independently ”replicate” or “support” Wakefield’s “findings”.

3. Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003; 23(6): 504-517 =
Ashwood P, Anthony A, Pellicer AA, Torrente F, Wakefield AJ. Intestinal lymphocyte populations in children with regressive autism: evidence for extensive mucosal immunopathology. Journal of Clinical Immunology, 2003;23:504-517.

Again, this paper seeks to further claim "a pan-enteric mucosal immunopathology in children with regressive autism that is apparently distinct from other inflammatory bowel diseases", but we know that Wakefield et al. are the only researchers who have "found" this in the past 15 or so years.

Same theme: Wakefield (and Anthony) is a co-author; cannot be said to support his own work.

4. Journal of Neuroimmunology 2005
A meaningless citation as this would be a whole volume of a journal - this happens if you just copy and paste without any regard to the content. Supports nothing except maybe the notion that the anti-vaccine folk cannot cite biomedical literature properly.
If you go back to whale.to, John was kind enough to link to to the paper, which is
Ashwood P, Wakefield AJ. Immune activation of peripheral blood and mucosal CD3+ lymphocyte cytokine profiles in children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms. J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Apr;173(1-2):126-34.

doesn't mention MMR, instead, the authors start from their own wrong premise "Gastrointestinal pathology, characterized by lymphoid nodular hyperplasia and entero-colitis, has been demonstrated in a cohort of children with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD)." and continue to find "In both peripheral blood and mucosa, [intracellular] CD3+ TNFalpha+ and CD3+ IFNgamma+ were increased in ASD children" ,
has Wakefield as senior author, therefore no independent replication of his results.

5. Brain, Behavior and Immunity 1993; 7: 97-103 =
Singh VK, Warren RP, Odell JD, Cole WP. Antibodies to myelin basic protein in children with autistic behavior. Brain, Behavior and Immunity 1993;7:97-103

Found some but not all children with autism had specific antibodies to myelin basic protein (MBP). Study did not look for measles virus, nor did study look for mumps or rubella virus or administration of the MMR.

It precedes the Lancet paper and in no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s claims.


6. Pediatric Neurology 2003; 28(4): 1-3 Citation not found.
According to whale.to, this is
Singh VK, Jensen RL Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism Pediatric Neurology 2003; 28(4): 292-294.

To the best of our knowledge, this study has not been replicated, and the findings refuted by several other studies, such as Baird G, Pickles A, Simonoff E, Charman T, Sullivan P, Chandler S, Loucas T, Meldrum D, Afzal M, Thomas B, Jin L, Brown D. Measles vaccination and antibody response in autism spectrum disorders. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Oct;93(10):832-7.
This study does not support Wakefield’s claims.

7. Neuropsychobiology 2005; 51:77-85 =
Jyonouchi H, Geng L, Ruby A, Zimmerman-Bier B. Dysregulated Innate Immune Responses in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Their Relationship to Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Dietary Intervention. Neuropsychobiology. 2005;28:51 77-85

This study did not look for measles virus but evaluated inflammatory response to specific dietary proteins.
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

8. The Journal of Pediatrics May 2005;146(5):605-10 =
Jyonouchi H, Geng L, Ruby A, Reddy C, Zimmerman-Bier B. Evaluation of an association between gastrointestinal symptoms and cytokine production against common dietary proteins in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Pediatr.2005;146(5):605-10.

This study did not look for measles virus. Instead, the study evaluated inflammatory response to specific dietary proteins.
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

9. Autism Insights 2009; 1: 1-11 citation not found on PubMed, but this refers to Krigsman, A. , Boris, M., Goldblatt, A., Stott, C. Clinical presentation and histologic findings at ileocolonoscopy in children with autistic spectrum disorder and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms Autism Insights 2010:2 1-11.

Arthur Krigsman was a colleague of Andrew Wakefield at Thoughtful House, Wakefield and Carol Stott (a contributor to this paper) are editors of the vanity press journal Autism Insights (previously discussed on LBRB. Not very likely that this "peer review" was very tough.
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

10. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology February 2009; 23(2): 95-98 =
Galiatsatos P, Gologan A, Lamoureux E, Autistic enterocolitis: Fact or fiction? Can J Gastroenterol. 2009:23:95-98

Case report, featuring two adult patients with gastrointestinal problems and ASD diagnoses. The authors call for “more investigations” in their discussion.

In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

11. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 2009:21(3): 148-161 =
Singh VK. Phenotypic expression of autoimmune autistic disorder (AAD): a major subset of autism. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Jul-Sep;21(3):148-61.

This paper makes assertions that are not supported by the evidence base in the paper. It is mainly a summary of research, with no mention of what children were looked at. Chris found the actual paper (https://www.aacp.com/Pages.asp?AID=7937&issue=&page=C&UID=), and among the data used it included a Wakefield paper = not independent. Also included in the references are papers from questionable journals like Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons and Medical Veritas, which all suddenly makes sense if you see that Singh is associated with these folk that tick the "our treatment heals everything" quack box (see one Singh study on PTSD).
This looks like it would support a connection between MMR and autism, but since no-one has independently reproduced this and the author stands to make money off the claims this review has to be viewed with extreme reservations.

12. Journal of Child Neurology June 29, 2009; 000:1-6 =
whale.to provides the pre-print, hence the missing volume and page numbers:
Genuis S.J., Bouchard, T.P. Celiac Disease Presenting as Autism, J Child Neurol January 2010 25(1):114-119

This paper proposes that many children with autism have celiac disease, that this causes micro nutrient deficiencies and that the behaviour of the children improves when you put them on a gluten free diet. No MMR mentioned.
Does not support Wakefield's claims.

13. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders March 2009;39(3):405-13 =
Nikolov RN, Bearss KE, Lettinga J, Erickson C, Rodowski M, Aman MG, McCracken JT, McDougle CJ, Tierney E, Vitiello B, Arnold LE, Shah B, Posey DJ, Ritz L, Scahill L. Gastrointestinal symptoms in a sample of children with pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Mar;39(3):405-13.

This study did not look for measles virus, nor did study look for mumps or rubella virus. Study evaluated children previously diagnosed with pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) for gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. 22.7% were found to exhibit GI symptoms, but were otherwise no different from subjects without GI problems in demographic characteristics, measures of adaptive functioning, or autism symptom severity.
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

14. Medical Hypotheses August 1998;51:133-144. =
Bolte, ER Autism and Clostridium tetani Medical Hypotheses August 1998;51:133-144.
Speculative paper presenting the hypothesis that autism symptoms are caused by a subacute, chronic tetanus infection
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

15. Journal of Child Neurology July 2000; ;15(7):429-35 =
Sandler RH, Finegold SM, Bolte ER, Buchanan CP, Maxwell AP, Väisänen ML, Nelson MN, Wexler HM. Short-term benefit from oral vancomycin treatment of regressive-onset autism. J Child Neurol. 2000;15:429-435

This study did not look for measles virus. Instead, this study evaluated 11 children’s response to a specific antibiotic. Gains faded following cessation of antibiotic.
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

16. Lancet. 1972;2:883-884 =
Walker-Smith J, Andrews J. Alpha-1-antitrypsin, autism, and coeliac disease. Lancet. 1972 Oct 21;2(7782):883-4.

This is a "letter to the editor" published decades prior to the Wakefield Lancet paper and can hardly be said to “replicate” the latter. Walker-Smith and Andrews report on the investigation of alpha-1-antitrypsin levels in 8 children with autism vs in children with untreated and treated celiac disease and control children and finds levels in children with autism and celiac disease are similar. This has little to do with Wakefield or the MMR (it also predates the introduction of the MMR), however, Dr. Walker-Smith is a co-author of the retracted study in The Lancet.
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

17. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia January-March 1971;1:48-62 =
Goodwin MS, Cowen MA, Goodwin TC Malabsorption and cerebral dysfunction: a multivariate and comparative study of autistic children. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1971 Jan-Mar;1(1):48-62.

A paper published decades previously cannot be said to “replicate” a later paper, the paper predates the introduction of the MMR vaccine in the US, the authors are not concerned with vaccination at all, but is mainly concerned with finding distinguishing features between childhood autism and adult schizophrenia using a number of challenges and physiological measurement. One minor in their discussion is that "malabsorption" would lead to autistic behaviour, so more in the sense of paper 12.

In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

18. Journal of Pediatrics March 2001;138:366-372.

Same paper as #2 above. Wakefield and 6 others from the Lancet paper are co-authors; cannot be said to support their own work.
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

19. Molecular Psychiatry 2002;7:375-382. Torrente F., Machado N., Perez-Machado M., Furlano R., Thomson M., Davies S., Wakefield AJ, Walker-Smith JA, Murch SH. Enteropathy with T cell infiltration and epithelial IgG deposition in autism. Molecular Psychiatry. 2002;7:375-382.

Gosh, we know these guys – it’s Andy Wakefield and his colleagues from that paper in The Lancet, this time claiming IgG deposit in gut samples indicative of an autoimmune gut pathology and call me cynical, but I don't believe any of this, because it has only ever been seen by this group.
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

20. American Journal of Gastroenterolgy April 2004;598-605.=
Torrente F, Anthony A, Heuschkel RB, Thomson MA, Ashwood P, Murch SH. Focal-enhanced gastritis in regressive autism with features distinct from Crohn’s and Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:598-605

Murch SH, Anthony A, Thompson MA, Torrente F and Ashwood P were previous co-authors with Wakefield A. Again, there are no independent groups reporting similar findings and this does not look at MMR or any vaccine anyway.
In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

21. Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003;23:504-517 =
Ashwood P, Anthony A, Pellicer AA, Torrente F, Walker-Smith JA, Wakefield AJ. Intestinal lymphocyte populations in children with regressive autism: evidence for extensive mucosal immunopathology. J Clin Immunol. 2003 Nov;23(6):504-17.

We totally get it by now – Wakefield and Wakefield’s colleagues confirm their own results.

In no way ”replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

22. Neuroimmunology April 2006;173(1-2):126-34 =
Ashwood P, Wakefield AJ. Immune activation of peripheral blood and mucosal CD3+ lymphocyte cytokine profiles in children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;173(1-2):126-34.

same as number 4.

23. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry December 30 2006;30:1472-1477 =
Shinohe A, Hashimoto K, Nakamura K, Tsujii M, Iwata Y, Tsuchiyaa KJ, Sekine Y, Suda S, Suzuki K, Sugihara G, Matsuzaki H, Minabe Y, Sugiyama T, Masayoshi Kawai M, Iyo M,Takei N and Mori N Increased serum levels of glutamate in adult patients with autism- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry Volume 30, Issue 8, 30 December 2006, Pages 1472-1477

Study of adults with autism on blood levels of amino acids, to assess whether altered glutamatergic neurotransmission was likely in autism. Study did not look for measles virus, nor did study look for mumps or rubella virus or anything connected with the gut.
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

24. Clinical Infectious Diseases September 1 2002;35(Suppl 1):S6-S16 =
Finegold SM, Molitoris D, Song Y, Liu C, Vaisanen ML, Bolte E, McTeague M, Sandler R, Wexler H, Marlowe EM, Collins MD, Lawson PA, Summanen P, Baysallar M, Tomzynski TJ, Read E, Johnson E, Rolfe R, Nasir P, Shah H, Haake DA, Manning P, Kaul A. Gastrointestinal microflora studies in late-onset autism. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Sep 1;35(Suppl 1):S6-S16.

Stool samples from children with regressive autism were compared to samples from children without autism; differences in stool flora were found. The study did not look for measles virus, nor did it look for mumps or rubella virus. Study did not evaluate changes in gut structure.
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

25. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004
Another of those citation snafus -
Song Y, Liu C, Finegold SM. Real-time PCR quantitation of clostridia in feces of autistic children. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Nov;70(11):6459-65.

This study describes how to do PCR for specific bacteria on stool samples of autistic and non autistic children.
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

26. Journal of Medical Microbiology October 2005;54:987-991 =
Parracho HM, Bingham MO, Gibson GR, McCartney AL. Differences between the gut microflora of children with autistic spectrum disorders and that of healthy children. J Med Microbiol. 2005 Oct;54(Pt 10):987-91.

More in the same vein: This study compared fecal flora for children with autism with two control groups: siblings without autism and unrelated children without autism. Minor differences were found. The study did not look for measles virus, nor did study look for mumps or rubella virus. Study did not evaluate changes in gut structure.
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

27. Archivos venezolanos de puericultura y pediatría 2006; Vol 69 (1): 19-25. = González LG., López K, Navarro DC, Negrón L, Flores LS, Rodríguez R, Martínez M, Sabrá A. Características endoscópicas, histológicas e inmunológicas de la mucosa digestiva en niños autistas con síntomas gastrointestinales [Endoscopic and Histological Characteristics of the Digestive Mucosa in Autistic Children with gastro-Intestinal Symptoms] Archivos Venezolanos de Puericultura y Pediatría Enero-Marzo 2006, Volúmen 69, Número 1 Arch Venez Pueri Pediatr 2006 69(1):19-25. 1.

The authors cannot replicate Wakefield’s 1998 “findings” of a distinct autistic enterocolitis, although they do report a higher incidence of gastrointestinal problems in their autistic group. 2. It appears that the Gonzalez paper was funded by Thoughtful House, under Wakefield’s leadership as previously shown
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

28. Gastroenterology. 2005:128 (Suppl 2);Abstract-303 =
Balzola F, Daniela C, Repici , Barbon V, Sapino A, Barbera C, Calvo PL, Gandione M, Rigardetto R*, and Rizzetto M .

This is a meeting abstract that has never been published as a peer reviewed study since 2005. Nine adult males with autism and GI symptoms were evaluated for GI disease. Study did not look for measles virus, nor did study look for mumps or rubella virus. Study did not evaluate changes in gut structure.
In no way “replicates” or “supports” Wakefield’s “findings”

Numbers: of 28 studies 2 were duplicates, 3 were only retrievable because of the links on the whale.to page, 13 were written by Wakefield and/or Lancet co-authors and/or Thoughful House colleagues (counting two duplicates), 3 predate the Lancet paper by years or even decades and not one independently replicates Wakefield’s claims, made in the retracted Lancet paper, the associated press conference and in many statements since.

21 comments:

  1. Thanks for this, and echoing your thanks to Chris and Liz Ditz. Nice to have a succinct summary with which to combat the inevitable bibliography salad of nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No, not Wakefield, but BMJ and dishonest journalist Brian Deer (probably paid for by lobbyst) are FRAUD.

    An Elaborate Fraud, Part 8: In Which The British Medical Journal Tries to Debunk a Clear-Cut Case of Regressive Autism - AGE OF AUTISM

    http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/11/an-elaborate-fraud-part-8-in-which-the-british-medical-journal-tries-to-debunk-a-clear-cut-case-of-regressive-autism.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed

    We Support Dr. Andrew Wakefield
    http://www.wesupportandywakefield.com/


    Being myself a scientist, have had a look at this case recently, and now i expect some serious reflection on this issue "Wakefield is fraud" on your blog. Thanks for attention.

    Ray

    ====

    ReplyDelete
  3. What about this one?
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19214283

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doesn't really support Wakefield, just suggests looking into his finding nor is it a true study with only two subjects

      Delete
  4. What about it? It's a description of gastritis in two individuals that are on the spectrum, incidentally, the ASD diagnosis preceded GI complaints by years.

    Try again.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ray or Anonymous, I am not a scientist but have performed a number of studies at both the graduate and undergraduate level. When looking at these studys, there are glaring holes. A number of them have Wakefield as either a co-author or siting his work. The blogger makes a great point, this does not constitute inedependant research. The next thing is it seems the rest of these studys were not written to identify the correlation because they were not looking at MMR. It is no different than you performing a study and coming accross a statistal outlyer (which occurs in every research project) that is in no way related to your experiment and saying what you find supports a previous theory. I again have not seen anywhere that someone has duplicated Dr. Wakfields results.

    ReplyDelete
  6. By the way, Ray your link to this article has an author approved edit. So there is no posting a contradictory response. I posted one and it was not published. I guess I should not have expected anything less. People dont like to be wrong or have the flaws in their research pointed out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here ya go babe ;P, read up...

    New Evidence Refutes Fraud Findings in Dr. Wakefield Case

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/01/24/new-evidence-refutes-fraud-findings-in-dr-wakefield-case.aspx



    28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s controversial findings:

    1. The Journal of Pediatrics November 1999; 135(5):559-63

    2. The Journal of Pediatrics 2000; 138(3): 366-372

    3. Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003; 23(6): 504-517

    4. Journal of Neuroimmunology 2005

    5. Brain, Behavior and Immunity 1993; 7: 97-103

    6. Pediatric Neurology 2003; 28(4): 1-3

    7. Neuropsychobiology 2005; 51:77-85

    8. The Journal of Pediatrics May 2005;146(5):605-10

    9. Autism Insights 2009; 1: 1-11

    10. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology February 2009; 23(2): 95-98

    11. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 2009:21(3): 148-161

    12. Journal of Child Neurology June 29, 2009; 000:1-6

    13. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders March 2009;39(3):405-13

    14. Medical Hypotheses August 1998;51:133-144.

    15. Journal of Child Neurology July 2000; ;15(7):429-35

    16. Lancet. 1972;2:883–884.

    17. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia January-March 1971;1:48-62

    18. Journal of Pediatrics March 2001;138:366-372.

    19. Molecular Psychiatry 2002;7:375-382.

    20. American Journal of Gastroenterolgy April 2004;598-605.

    21. Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003;23:504-517.

    22. Neuroimmunology April 2006;173(1-2):126-34.

    23. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol Biol. Psychiatry December 30 2006;30:1472-1477.

    24. Clinical Infectious Diseases September 1 2002;35(Suppl 1):S6-S16

    25. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004;70(11):6459-6465

    26. Journal of Medical Microbiology October 2005;54:987-991

    27. Archivos venezolanos de puericultura y pediatría 2006; Vol 69 (1): 19-25.

    28. Gastroenterology. 2005:128 (Suppl 2);Abstract-303

    http://mickiesprogress.blogspot.com/2012/05/28-studies-from-around-world-that.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anon - those are the 28 studies that I take down as supporting evidence in my post above (which is a year old btw), so you read up, honey :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. A veritable gish gallop of tosh that was already refuted. Anon, perhaps you should actually read your copy pasta, not a single one supports Wakefield's findings.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The review is only partially true. Yes, these studies don't COPY the original research of Wakefield et al. However, they mostly support partial findings that alltogether make the Wakefield's research conclusion reasonable. These are:
    1, GI problems CAN lead to brain damage, regression, and autism
    2, GI problems are much more prevalent in autistic children than in general population
    3, MMR vaccine can lead to GI problems
    4, There are several mechanisms that can lead to GI problems, including immunological (chronic inflamation), microbiological (pathological gut flora) etc, that can even work in combinations or synergistically
    5, Vaccine measles virus has been found in inflamed gut of autistic children
    6, There are even non-GI mechanisms for MMR vaccine to damage brain, including autoimmune reaction to MBP, postvaccination encephalitis/meningitis, excitotoxicity triggered by chronic infection etc.

    So the picture is complicated, and any of these studies just paint part of it. This is however no excuse for ignorance of tossing them all out "because none of them painted the whole picture at once".

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Anon, Wakefield's conclusions were made up.

    1, GI problems CAN lead to brain damage, regression, and autism

    That is a) not true and b) not supported by any of the above papers. You may find GI problems in children with brain damage, regression and autism. No causal relationship has been established anywhere.

    2, GI problems are much more prevalent in autistic children than in general population

    potentially, but that doesn't mean what you think it means, see for example http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22511450

    3, MMR vaccine can lead to GI problems

    no

    4, There are several mechanisms that can lead to GI problems, including immunological (chronic inflamation), microbiological (pathological gut flora) etc, that can even work in combinations or synergistically

    and?

    5, Vaccine measles virus has been found in inflamed gut of autistic children

    nope, measles virus has been found in the gut sample of one autistic and one non autistic child by Hornig et al. All Wakefield's and colleagues' results were artefacts from laboratory contaminations.

    6, There are even non-GI mechanisms for MMR vaccine to damage brain, including autoimmune reaction to MBP, postvaccination encephalitis/meningitis, excitotoxicity triggered by chronic infection etc.

    There are a lot of crackpot theories out there that have nothing to do with Wakefield's findings, autism or even reality. Our analysis above stands. No one has ever reproduced Wakefield's findings, and that is not for lack of trying.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Regarding last two comments, also note that Anonymous is moving the goal post. The original blog post to which you have been responding claimed "numerous replication studies," by "other researchers," that "confirm his findings," in countries, four named, "around the world."

    You have shown that the only cited studies that approximate Wakefield's findings have him as a co-author, that even some of his co-authored studies are not replication studies, and that those non-independent studies took place in the two countries where he has lived, because he did them.

    Anonymous now wants to redefine the issue as, is there potentially some plausible association between broadly defined GI problems and autism. That may be an interesting question though if there is, it also is not clear in which direction the causality would run, never mind mechanism in either direction, or the possibility of a confounding association of both phenomena with a third, and causal, phenomenon. The initial Wakefield claim in fact was of such an association -- measles virus in wild or vaccine form. Insofar as the literature above addresses the GI disease/autism relationship in general, you have shown that it does not even consider measles or MMR vaccine, and so does not support the original Wakefield claim.

    To summarize, Wakefield's original claim rests on Anonymous' points 1) GI disease can cause "brain damage, regression and autism," and 3) MMR vaccination can cause GI disease. You refute 1, deny 3, and show that none of the alleged supporting literature that actually is independent addresses MMR at all.

    Anonymous is doing a lot of handwaving for distraction.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Very pleased to see that this post is still active. I will use it as a reference, and I hope that the admins will keep it updated.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wow - what a pile of crap spam that is....

    ReplyDelete
  15. Let's get this right. You are now not just claiming that Wakefield is a fraud but that every scientist who has ever written something with him is also a fraud - and that seems to be a substantial number of scientists judging by the list above.

    And btw he wasn't struck off for fraud but for dubious ethics related to extracting samples from children - the fraud allegation came from Deer and was never checked up by anyone else. Wakefield said that Deer just made it up!

    I am not any kind of anti-vaccine campaigner but scientific results need to be tested in a proper way - not by innuendo and witch-hunts. The UK government was singularly responsible for any measles outbreak (not epidemic) due to parents concerns. Maverick scientists should be allowed to be wrong because sometimes they are right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Let's get this right. You are now not just claiming that Wakefield is a fraud but that every scientist who has ever written something with him is also a fraud"

      Reading comprehension fail. They are not independent studies unless they are done by someone not affiliate by Wakefield. Since these people were working closely to Wakefield and were supporters they are by definition biased.

      Delete
    2. The allegations against Wakefield were investigated & in fact, Wakefield refused to offer any defense at all - basically conceding that the charges against him were true....

      Delete
    3. Yes, jgdes misunderstood the relevance of Wakefield co-authors in studies purporting to be independent.

      But he also failed to understand the content of the GMC investigation and decision. In the decision striking off Wakefield's medical license, the GMC specifically pointed to fraudulent actions, including his claiming that children were referred to his study through the process approved in the protocol and concealing the fact that they were selected by Wakefield and the lawyers hoping to represent them as litigants. The GMC investigation looked into Brian Deer's claims, found them to be correct and added a good deal of additional material. The process was lengthy, careful and fair -- not at all "innuendo and witch-hunts."

      And the assertion that the UK government was "singularly responsible for any measles outbreak ... due to parents concerns" is baffling. Parents were concerned because a fraudulent study and a cynical media campaign had made them concerned. How is that the fault of the UK government?

      Perhaps jgdes is "not any kind of anti-vaccine campaigner", but everything in that comment is both false and exactly what anti-vaccine campaigners tend to say.

      Delete
  16. seems as if also balzola is not really 'independent', at least he has published together with wakefield previously.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9789132

    ReplyDelete